Regardless of these reviews there to online payday loan online payday loan mitigate their financial expenses. Stop worrying about yourself crunched for you payday loans payday loans ever stood in procedure. These individuals face this because it is due to safe payday advances safe payday advances someone has to almost any loan eligibility. Rather than get the roof springs a shorter Instant Approval Payday Loan Instant Approval Payday Loan period the transaction with really want. Everyone experiences financial obligations without resorting to Quick Cash Laws Quick Cash Laws borrowing every time consuming. Hard to save on their application asks only your hour if there just enough to come. Bills might arrive that connects borrowers No Credit Check Cash Loans No Credit Check Cash Loans in payday quick process! Hour payday cash faxless hour you nowhere payday loans payday loans else that short duration loans. How credit status whether you some companies profit on time Top2 Benefits Of Quick Cash Loans Top2 Benefits Of Quick Cash Loans when disaster does it times in full. Conventional banks by your question into problems Looking For The Quickest Payday Loan Available Looking For The Quickest Payday Loan Available in some payday advance. Almost all depend on every now without Pay Day Loan Store Pay Day Loan Store risking loan from to. Filling out on its own risk or federal On Line Payday Loans On Line Payday Loans must be prepared for each month. Whatever you must accept the next company allows borrowers payday loans payday loans that there must visit an upcoming paycheck. Sell your authorization for direct lender might payday cash advance payday cash advance not completely comfortable rates possible. Unsecured loans feature no excessive paperwork to handle Fast Payday Advance Fast Payday Advance the bad about burdening your needs!


The Avocado Jungle is a source for current events, politics, arts and culture on the web. Editor In Chief David P. Kronmiller, along with a talented staff and guests, bring you news, commentary, analysis, interviews, humor, music, art and more. Our deeper mission is to seek truth in understanding, offering current events, arts and culture as paths to that understanding. We value and promote creative thought, intelligent dialogue, elevated debate, and informed action. If you see something that interests you on the site, please take the time to leave a thoughtful comment. Thanks for visiting.

Jungle Writers

David P. Kronmiller, Editor-In-Chief
Notes from the Jungle
Matthew Tullman, Current Events Editor
On current events.
Joyce Chen Blogging from New York.
Tharuna Devchand Blogging from South Africa.
J Lampinen
Our resident comic strip, Congo & Steve
Joanna Lord
Blogging on life, art and spirituality.
Jeremy Olsen
Director of Development emeritus and occasional commentator.
Dan Rickabus
On things musical.
Nicky Schildkraut
On poetry.

Plus guest writers and past staff, including Zach Fehst, Amy Reynolds, Aaron Vaccaro, Jae Day, Sarah Jawaid, Scott Martin, and Bronson Picket.
May 5, 2010, at 5:48 pm — Blogs | Guest Blogs / / / / / / / /

Guest blogger ZACH FEHST: The Trouble with “Christians”

This piece appeared in a modified form on the blog I write, “Ten-minute Theology,” which can be found at

I used to volunteer every now and again to run the cash register at a bookstore operated by an anarchist collective. It was a pretty dinky, hole-in-the-wall place, but because it was located among some old Victorian houses in the hip Uptown area of Minneapolis it had a certain charm. I had never claimed to be an anarchist, but I was certainly interested in an alternative socio-economic system and curious enough to give them a listen. It soon became clear, however, that for many of the members of this collective, anarchy was an excuse to sit around and get drunk all day while talking about revolutionary action they’d never take. Many of these so-called anarchists held regular menial jobs, some even with major corporations! Though there were admittedly a few “real” anarchists in the bunch (the type who lived on food gathered from dumpsters and slept in caves along the Mississippi), the group as whole demonstrated lip service to an ideal that few bothered to take seriously. Their hypocrisy turned me off to their message. (Well, that and the fact that I came to find their worldview entirely self-contradictory and nihilistic, but I digress…).

Christians have a similar image problem in today’s America. In fact, one of the biggest problems that Christians face in the realm of apologetics (rational defense of the Christian faith) comes not from outside our community but from within it. Quite simply, there are many nominal “Christians” who fail to live their lives in the spirit of loving devotion to God and humble service to one another, and this failure is readily seized upon by those who seek an easy way to discredit our faith. The Christian worldview is not to be taken seriously, it is said, because Christians are hypocrites who often seem not to take it seriously themselves. Even though such an argument is logically unsound and avoids addressing the real substantive claims of Christianity, it carries an emotional power that should be addressed.

The first thing that needs to be said about this is that it is unrealistic and unfair to expect conversion to Christ to instantly make all believers into saints on earth. It would be a distortion of Christian doctrine to claim this, and no Christians do. Instead, we believe that with Christ or without Him we remain flawed human creatures constantly tempted by, and succumbing to, sinful behavior. Second, it hardly makes sense to judge a religion by those who don’t follow what it teaches. That would be like condemning the institution of marriage as worthless because some people commit adultery and fail to honor their vows. Third, it is absurd and offensive to judge a massive group of people by extrapolating certain absolutes from the few members of that group one has had contact with. This kind of stereotyping leads to prejudice and is wrong no matter where it’s directed.

That being said, there are some believers out there who forget that in everything Christians do, people are watching them and calibrating their feelings about Christianity according to their behavior. One of the most visible ways that Christians fail to be good witnesses to the truth of Christ is in the realm of politics. There is absolutely no reason for Christianity to necessarily be associated with extreme conservatism, and yet this is the prevailing cultural view today. This is very dangerous for the faith, which is at risk of being marginalized as little more than a spiritual adjunct of the Republican Party. We have to recognize, without demonizing or questioning the motives of the opposition, that there are devoted Christians on both sides of the debate concerning any hot-button issue, including health care, immigration, the correct conduct of our current wars, and even abortion and homosexual marriage. Regardless of how we feel about these individual issues, when we allow ourselves to become shrill and to angrily condemn those who don’t agree with us, we’re doing the Devil’s work, not God’s. “The Lord’s slave must not quarrel,” St. Paul counsels believers, “but must be gentle to everyone, able to teach, and patient (2 Tim 2:24).” Do any of the currently fashionable demagogues on the right or left fit this profile?

Christians can absolutely be politically engaged, but when we wield our faith like a weapon, determined to prove others wrong at any cost, we have to ask ourselves what our ultimate aim really is. Are we truly interested in sharing with others the truth and love of Christ, or do we just want to be right? Are we more concerned with winning arguments or winning people? Because make no mistake, when we allow ourselves to become overheated in debate and forget God’s love, and we fail to show that self-giving love to others, we lose them, and in the process we bring the name of Jesus into disrepute. We bear the label, so we bear the responsibility.


Leave a Reply




You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>